You will by now have seen the statement by
Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair reporting that I have withdrawn
my previous acceptance of his invitation to chair the National Intelligence
Council.
I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of my
record would not cease upon my entry into office. The effort to smear me
and to destroy my credibility would instead continue. I do not believe the
National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was
under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the
views of a political faction in a foreign country. I agreed to chair the
NIC to strengthen it and protect it against politicization, not to introduce it
to efforts by a special interest group to assert control over it through a
protracted political campaign.
As those who know me are well aware, I
have greatly enjoyed life since retiring from government. Nothing was
further from my mind than a return to public service. When Admiral Blair
asked me to chair the NIC I responded that I understood he was "asking me to
give my freedom of speech, my leisure, the greater part of my income, subject
myself to the mental colonoscopy of a polygraph, and resume a daily commute to a
job with long working hours and a daily ration of political abuse." I
added that I wondered "whether there wasn't some sort of downside to this
offer." I was mindful that no one is indispensable; I am not an
exception. It took weeks of reflection for me to conclude that, given the
unprecedentedly challenging circumstances in which our country now finds itself
abroad and at home, I had no choice but accept the call to return to public
service. I thereupon resigned from all positions that I had held and all
activities in which I was engaged. I now look forward to returning to
private life, freed of all previous obligations.
I am not so immodest as
to believe that this controversy was about me rather than issues of public
policy. These issues had little to do with the NIC and were not at the
heart of what I hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to
President Obama and his administration. Still, I am saddened by what the
controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted
themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil
society. It is apparent that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a
serious public discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of
great importance to our country as well as to our allies and friends.
The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show
conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view
other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American
understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the
Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character
assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the
fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim
of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto
over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the
substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and
all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that
it favors.
There is a special irony in having been accused of improper
regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so
clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government —
in this case, the government of Israel. I believe that the inability of
the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US
policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics
has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten
the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in
the United States to say so. This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and
their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national
security of the United States.
The outrageous agitation that followed
the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious
questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own
decisions about the Middle East and related issues. I regret that my
willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its
ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the
interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing
the will and interests of a foreign government.
In the court of
public opinion, unlike a court of law, one is guilty until proven
innocent. The speeches from which quotations have been lifted from their
context are available for anyone interested in the truth to read. The
injustice of the accusations made against me has been obvious to those with open
minds. Those who have sought to impugn my character are uninterested in
any rebuttal that I or anyone else might make.
Still, for the
record: I have never sought to be paid or accepted payment from any foreign
government, including Saudi Arabia or China, for any service, nor have I ever
spoken on behalf of a foreign government, its interests, or its policies.
I have never lobbied any branch of our government for any cause, foreign or
domestic. I am my own man, no one else's, and with my return to private
life, I will once again — to my pleasure — serve no master other than
myself. I will continue to speak out as I choose on issues of concern to
me and other Americans.
I retain my respect and confidence in President
Obama and DNI Blair. Our country now faces terrible challenges abroad as
well as at home. Like all patriotic Americans, I continue to pray that our
president can successfully lead us in surmounting them.
|