The Free Energy Conundrum
Is Humanity Ready for Abundance?
Wade Frazier
December 2005
A Summary of the Free
Energy Conundrum
Laying aside the Mind
Crutches
Pitfalls and
Unproductive Paths
What Can Be Done about
the Conundrum?
A Summary of the Free Energy Conundrum
·
On the upside - an
unprecedented human journey based on abundance
instead of scarcity can be catalyzed by a transition to free energy, while
healing the environment at the same time;
·
On the downside -
today’s energy production methods are destroying
the biosphere; energy scarcity is the primary reason for global poverty,
and the Middle East is increasingly becoming the site of energy wars, which may
ignite World War III.
·
The
technologies that use those energy sources have been subjected to deep secrecy
(Black Budget, Above Top Secret,
privatized);
·
Those
attempting to independently develop technology to use those energy sources have
been bought out or wiped out, although such
efforts usually self-destruct before attaining the stage where they need
derailing;
·
Those leading
the suppression of the independent efforts also control the extensively
developed free energy technologies, and their influence is wielded in subtle
yet powerful fashion; they are forcing artificial scarcity onto humanity for
reasons of earthly power (I call them the Big Boys in my work).
·
Most people are unaware
that the situation exists, largely due to the clandestine methods used to keep
the situation unknown and a compliant media system, but also because most
people do not want to know;
·
Those exposed to this
situation usually deny it, often by dismissing it as a “conspiracy theory;”
·
Those acknowledging the
situation’s reality usually have unproductive reactions, such as:
o
paranoia;
o
apathy;
o
hopelessness;
o
trying to expose or
punish the suppressors;
o
beating the suppressors
at their own game;
o
trying to get a piece
of the suppression action for themselves;
o
thwarting those
attempting to overcome the suppression, as they try stealing the
technology/market for themselves;
·
Those acknowledging the
situation and attempting a constructive response, such as mounting an effort to
develop such technologies and bring them to the public, or educating the public
about the situation, seem to number fewer than one thousand people; and of
those, the number possessing the integrity sufficient to mount a potentially
successful effort is probably fewer than one hundred people.
4. If an effort to overcome the
suppression and public inertia is going to have a realistic chance of
succeeding, that final group needs to grow to thousands of people, to form a
critical mass. The effort needs to reach far beyond the small and insular
alternative energy community. Simply becoming aware of the issue and
engaging in constructive dialogue may be all that is needed. The primary
qualification for a member of that critical mass group is nearly incorruptible
integrity. The task is formidable, because people of that level of
integrity are less than one-per-thousand in the U.S.
general population, but that approach appears to have the best chance of
success with the least risk to the participants.
The bold contentions in this summary are
explored at depth in the following essay. Perhaps the above summary is
incorrect, but nobody I trust with significant experience in that milieu
denies its basic thrust.
My journey into alternative energy began
more than thirty years ago, when my first professional mentor invented what was
considered the world’s best engine for powering an
automobile. Today’s “cutting edge” cars are using innovations my
mentor invented long ago, such as hybrid cars recycling the energy absorbed
from applying a car’s brakes. I dreamed long ago about changing the way
humanity produces and uses its energy. I eventuality chased my dream, only to have it become a nightmare. My journey was filled with
numerous lessons, and many were reluctantly learned. I know of no effort
in world history of higher profile or of more persistence or closer to success
in bringing significant alternative energy to humanity than Dennis Lee’s efforts, and I was with him during
some of his adventures’ darkest chapters. I think he did his most
interesting work before I met him. There is no teacher like experience,
and I am writing this essay with the hope that it will assist those few who try
bringing alternative energy to humanity, and perhaps help heaven on earth come into being.
My primary lesson was one I resisted for
many years, until I finally had it beaten into my
head: personal integrity is earth’s scarcest commodity, and applying a
sufficient pool of it to the free energy conundrum is the key to making
it happen. If an alternative energy effort does not begin with people of
the highest integrity, it will not get very far. Almost without
exception, when I have mentioned that harsh lesson and its ramifications,
people have responded by ignoring it or presenting irrelevant counter-examples
or dismissing it as of minor consequence. It is not an enjoyable
realization, but it is today’s reality. While denial may seem a valid defense mechanism, it is
ultimately self-defeating, particularly in this context. True skepticism
is a virtue (which means getting out of one’s armchair and honestly
investigating before launching opinions), but I have rarely experienced a genuinely
skeptical reaction, which reinforces my primary lesson. I expect
my work to be greeted with skepticism, because it is so alien to the average
American’s experience, so this essay is peppered with footnotes and links that
lead to evidence that illustrate my points.
First of all, what follows is why a lack of
integrity dooms alternative energy efforts. All
economies for all time have been primarily dependent on energy.
Today’s energy industry is the world’s most powerful, and a new energy source,
particularly one that could easily replace conventional energy sources, has
long been the subject of novels, motion pictures and other mass media.
The economic value of such an energy source is beyond the dreams of avarice.
Several trillion dollars of revenue are generated annually by the energy and
related industries, such as transportation. Even that vast sum
misleadingly minimizes the importance of energy, because without energy to run
the show, industrialized civilization would
quickly grind to a halt.
When people begin pursuing
alternative energy, whether it is in pure or applied research, prototype
development or the more advanced stages of entrepreneurialism, manufacturing
and marketing, greed nearly always rears its head and defeats most attempts
before they even get started. Dennis has likened the situation to the
movie The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, where everybody wanted to wipe
out everybody else so they would not have to share their plunder. The
stakes are higher in the free energy pursuit than any other on earth, and
bringing a genuine alternative energy to market, one that can impact the global
marketplace, is not something that a lone inventor or entrepreneur can
accomplish. It will take a major effort by many players to make
alternative/free energy happen, and stealing a prototype or start-up company is
futile, if developing a genuine alternative energy for the public is the
goal. I have watched numerous attempts to steal Dennis’ companies, and
the two successful attempts I witnessed in the 1980s were performed when the
Big Boys had Dennis in a headlock.[1] Before I
met Dennis, his companies were stolen several times by his business associates
and once by organized crime, which then pulled off a genuine scam of the
public. I saw some particularly incompetent attempts to steal Dennis’
companies that I witnessed after our days in
Ventura. Steven Greer calls the Big Boys “Godzilla,”
but the economic jungle is also filled with T-Rexes, velociraptors and other
predators. The jungle is not filled with gentle, herbivorous beasts and
one super-predator.
After Dennis’ company was stolen in Seattle,
I watched several groups fight over the
company’s carcass, and none of them did anything productive with
it. Also, if any of them became productive, they would have quickly
discovered the hard way why Dennis’ company was defunct when they stole it, but
they were blinded by their greed. Also, the employees not involved in
stealing the companies often stole anything they could on their way out, a
phenomenon vividly evident in Ventura.
For those people, the Big Boys’ suppression efforts gave them theft
opportunities. Greed is one of the seven deadly sins and is the fear of never having
enough. It is an irrational fear that can never be extinguished by
hoarding wealth. After obscene amounts of wealth are stolen from others,
the fear then becomes focused on amassing as much control over others as possible,
trying to play God.
When the Big Boys’ hammer came down, those
not actively stealing were mainly motivated by self-preservation, and those
running and hiding or crawling before agents of the Big Boys, begging for mercy
(or actively helping the Big Boys, as a way to avoid their wrath), may have
provided a more disheartening spectacle than the thievery did. A third
category of ignoble behavior was provided by many of those who did not fall
into the first two categories: blaming and attacking Dennis became a favored
activity, probably because he was an easy target, particularly when the Big
Boys had him in a headlock. Many people fell into all three categories.
All those actions evidenced low personal
integrity, and when the dust had settled in Ventura, human behavior could never
surprise me again. There were heartening exceptions to that low-integrity
rule, however, with Mr. Professor shining the
brightest. People like him were needles in haystacks. I have sought
people like him ever since, and have encountered very few who may have
had the right stuff. Just as nearly everybody thinks they are an adequate
housekeeper or a competent driver, nearly everybody thinks they possess high
integrity. Passing an integrity test of the magnitude that Mr. Professor
took often costs one their career/net
worth/health/life, so those who have proven their integrity at those levels
can rarely join together to make something important happen, because their
lives have usually been destroyed.
Laying aside the Mind Crutches
When I staggered out of Ventura in 1990, I
realized that whatever I had been taught about the world was probably not true,
and for the next twelve years I read around two hundred thousand pages of
material. A primary thrust was researching what I had been taught,
comparing it to my adult researches and seeing if it held up. It rarely
did. Although my ride with Dennis radicalized me, I also had some early
experiences that aided my receptivity to the lessons, such as my family changing its diet when I was twelve and
being introduced to paranormal phenomena at age sixteen.
As I performed my adult research on what I
was taught while young, I realized that most of my “learning” that failed under
scrutiny was not simply a haphazard assortment of misinformation. The
misinformation was apparently designed to indoctrinate me into certain ways of
“thinking.” Here are some examples of what I discovered during my adult
researches.
I was fortunate to be raised relatively free
of religious indoctrination, but I received its secular equivalent in my
“education.” Was I taught anything that was true? I am not
sure. My indoctrination gave me various “mind crutches.” Crutches
can help people walk until they longer need them, but crutches can also produce
cripples who cannot imagine living without crutches. The mind crutches I
was given are seemingly of the latter variety. Why do our educational and
media systems produce people with an inverted sense of reality? Apparently,
so people can be manipulated via their mind crutches. How do mind
crutches work to cripple people’s minds? To a significant degree, they
work because they appeal to people’s self interest and egos, particularly their
vices.
If Americans believe they belong to the
greatest, most benevolent society of all time, then they can rape and plunder
the world’s people (particularly the poor ones) with a clear conscience or only
passing awareness, because our international acts are obviously designed to
help the world’s downtrodden, right? To question the assumption of
American benevolence can lead to cognitive
dissonance, and few Americans have proven themselves capable of resolving
the dissonance by discarding the false beliefs they were indoctrinated
with. The truth then becomes unthinkable, and that delusional
state provides fertile ground for more delusions to take root, the deluded
paying an immense price in lost sentience. The human ego explains a great
deal of that dynamic, but there are also rewards for playing the game and
penalties for failing to. For instance, I do not walk down the halls of
my corporate employer and contradict capitalistic dogma. If I did, I
would not be there long. The result is that Americans are largely a
semi-sentient people who mindlessly repeat the catechisms they were
indoctrinated with. A monkey can be trained to wave a
flag on cue. Most people never break free and learn to think for
themselves on those subjects, proving that pope’s observation: “Give me a child
until he is five, and he is mine for life.” I recently encountered the
observation that America’s official bird should be changed from the bald eagle
to the parrot, an observation with keen significance since September 11, 2001.
Here are the mind crutches that Americans
need to discard (or stop leaning on so heavily) if they want to help a world of
abundance appear:
The above doctrines are all based on the
scarcity principle, as they exalt one group at the expense of others. The
first three do it quite obviously, the other three more subtly.
People cannot help an abundance principle
take root when their minds are mired in scarcity consciousness.
The first three doctrines have been
prominently used to justify violating others and have fostered egocentric
delusions that provided the justifications, such as the Chosen People, wealth
elitism, the Promised Land, Manifest Destiny or its successor Lebensraumpolitik. Those first three
mind crutches form the triune faith of most Americans. Scarcely an
American can be found who does not regularly kneel at one of those
altars. In nationalism, we are elevated above other nations by virtue of
our being born here. My American Empire essay
was partly intended as an antidote to American nationalism. The essays in
this section of my website are intended as an
antidote to capitalism, which might be the most inefficient economic
system yet devised, as it is quickly destroying the planet and provides the
rationale for doing so. Every organized religion is to some extent
a corruption of the vision the religion was erected in the name of. In
Christianity in particular, kneeling at the right altar is the ticket to
heaven, and those kneeling at the wrong altars (or those not kneeling at all)
are condemned by the Almighty. People having near-death
experiences or those who have learned to explore
other planes of existence do not describe anything like a gatekeeper to “heaven,” and those in “hell” are there because they want to be, and
leave when they are no longer attracted to it. The scarcity
principle is ingrained into our societies in ways that can seem invisible, such
as our sports and games, where there is almost always one ultimate winner and
many losers.
Those last three doctrines are interrelated
and subtler than the first three. Those holding to Enlightenment ideals
(I will call them Enlightenment doctrines in this essay) often subscribe to
those three. People can easily pursue experiences that show how false and
limiting those doctrines are. All three doctrines have the denigration of
consciousness in common. Consciousness, in those doctrines, is seen as dependent
on biochemistry, and the rational aspect of consciousness is the only one
considered important, and phenomena such as intuition, emotion or love are
minimized. History’s greatest physicists did
not subscribe to those doctrines, and anybody can easily be trained to
experience paranormal phenomena, clearly
demonstrating that chemistry-based consciousness models are woefully
deficient. Those subscribing to Enlightenment doctrines often ignore or
dismiss evidence that we are not alone in the universe and are regularly
visited by extra-terrestrial civilizations.
For instance, over the past generation more than three thousand people have
witnessed UFOs appearing on request at a Washington ranch. I went to see
for myself this year, and I was not disappointed.[2]
Those subscribing to Enlightenment doctrines also tend to dismiss the notion
that the world’s political-economic system is managed by surreptitious means,
usually dismissing the notion as a “conspiracy
theory,” and almost always deny that the Above
Top Secret world even exists, preferring to focus on the bureaucratic aspect of covert action. I discovered
that many who are great at describing our immense problems do not want to
hear about solutions that topple their scarcity-based
paradigm.
As R.
Buckminster Fuller observed, economics has always been the name of the
elite game, with politics a mere byproduct; all political actors are “stooges“
of the economic interests. Today’s most radical political and economic
ideologies are still based upon the scarcity principle, and all political
systems have been primarily concerned with who
gets the scarce resources. Pursuing free energy (or significant
alternative energy) is the most radical economic act on earth today, and only
when an effort becomes “threatening” do activists encounter the Big Boy
gatekeepers. The billion-dollar bribe we
were offered to stop pursuing free energy is not a “conspiracy theory” but the
reporting of our experiences. Also, those pursuing that path at a
level where they threatened to make an economic impact all report similar experiences. There is no theory
about it, but that situation has never been constructively engaged by any
political faction that I have encountered, and I have encountered just about
all of them.
Experience may be the only teacher,
and the pitfalls and unproductive paths presented here are those I have
experienced myself or heard of from first-hand participants. Just as
teenagers often think their parents do not know anything, many in the free
energy community whom I have tried cautioning with tales of pitfalls have
denied their relevance as they blithely headed for those very same
pitfalls. It has not been easy to watch. For a teenage boy,
learning some of life’s lessons the hard way is part of growing up. When
pursuing free energy, learning those lessons the hard way often means having
one’s life destroyed, if not prematurely ended. Only those with the
crazed persistence of a Dennis Lee get to make the attempt
more than once. I learned many of my lessons the hard way, and seek to
help others avoid learning them the hard way.
Here are some of the more important pitfalls
and unproductive activities that I have seen.
Denial - This pitfall kills most free energy efforts before
they get very far. The denial relates to many facets of the free energy
conundrum (such as that the Big Boys even exist or are vigilant). Because
the free energy arena is like no other, denial of how it operates is common and
can be fatal for its participants. For instance, except for my years with
Dennis, I have spent my entire career in corporate America. The free
energy scene only vaguely resembles how corporate America operates.
Thinking it does is one of the many pitfalls that free energy activists
encounter. Believing in the fairy tales of capitalism and nationalism is
particularly dangerous for somebody pursuing free energy. The most
harmful denial often relates to denying that the pitfalls listed below even exist,
or can be leapt over or run past too quickly for them to matter.
Delusions of grandeur - I have yet to meet a human without an ego.
When pondering the implications of free energy, the situation’s immensity can
seduce the ego. Delusions of grandeur can take root, and one must always
be vigilant of them. I had fleeting delusions of grandeur during my days
with Dennis, and I have seen the bug bite others fiercely.[3]
Seeking “humanitarian assistance” and
rich benefactors - All free energy
efforts have always operated on a shoestring, and all have tried raising money
somehow. Each fundraising method has its pitfalls, and the most futile
one I have seen is seeking a rich benefactor. If a rich person genuinely
tries helping out, they quickly get a horse’s head
in their bed, get their money seized, and so
on. More often, the “benefactor” tries controlling the effort from the
outset or stealing the technology/company or waits
like a vulture for the opportunity to take over when they smell easy
profits. Dennis has interacted with numerous billionaires and has never
seen one part with a dollar relating to helping free energy happen. They
all seem to heed Bill Gates’ dictum, “You don’t get rich by cutting
checks.” “Humanitarian” groups often hamper efforts like developing free
energy, in a bizarre situation where the biggest obstacles to realizing the
solutions are the people who say they seek solutions.
Needing a paycheck - This is related to the above pitfall, and is the
primary reason I have pursued my Website work as I have. If people in a
free energy venture must immediately be paid for their efforts, they are already
defeated. Economic need kills most free energy efforts, and when I saw
all the employee theft in Ventura, it was
because the company owed them one week of wages. I have seen that
need come in many guises, and if a significant free energy effort ever becomes
viable, it will be due to people who are giving, not getting. That is why
there is a free energy conundrum - there have not been enough people involved
who are more interested in giving than getting. If the people involved
are starving or need regular, corporate-sized paychecks to be involved, the
effort is doomed before it begins.
Greed - Dealt with at length above.
Naïveté - I fell into that pitfall regularly during my
journey with Dennis. It took awhile to wake up to the free energy
milieu’s reality. Most people will have to negotiate that pitfall to get
very far along the path. The most common reaction I have heard to the
free energy conundrum is also the most naïve,
which goes like this, “If this was possible, I would be able to buy it.”
That statement reflects a belief in the magic of capitalism, where the best,
brightest and most benevolent always triumph. Not even Adam Smith believed it. It also reflects a
belief in the fairy tale of American nationalism.
Disbelief is the most common reaction to the billion-dollar
bribe that we received, and engineers and technical professionals often
prove to be the most naïve of all, as Bucky Fuller observed. Mailing off working free energy prototypes to the Big Boys,
hoping for a tickertape parade, gets the wrong kind of attention. Naïveté
can be a fatal pitfall in the free energy pursuit.
Seeking
specialist opinions - One on hand,
seeking specialist opinions may seem prudent, but on the other hand, most
scientists, engineers and technical professionals undergo heavy indoctrination
disguised as learning and can rarely think past their textbooks, which is related to that pope’s
observation. For instance, there have been credible experimental
results that call into question the Second
Law of Thermodynamics. That “laws” of physics even exist shows how
much like a religion physics is. There are no “laws” of physics, only
theories. The first person to perform those law-defying experiments died in a U.S. prison, with the U.S. government
destroying his equipment. A scientist who related to me his own
experimental results was murdered not long ago.
While what Thomas Kuhn called “normal”
science is an honorable and necessary part of scientific endeavor, and
those performing normal science are firmly wrapped in their paradigm and rarely
glimpse beyond it or comprehend evidence that challenges
their paradigm. Less than 1% of scientists and engineers have the
creative insight and discrimination needed to successfully evaluate novel
experimental data or technology, and the best of them are always cautious about
saying that something is “impossible,” which my first
professional mentor taught me. Thinking that a physicist or engineer
is qualified by their orthodox training/experience to evaluate free energy
technology or theory is the height of folly. Some of the most irrational
responses to my work have been by engineers, scientists and academics, and some
of their most illogical responses have been regarding areas where they claim expertise.[4]
Failure
to separate the wheat from the chaff
- Because few with scientific or technical training can properly evaluate novel
theory, data or technology, it does not mean that nobody can. Finding
those people is difficult, however, and there are many garage mechanics and
electronics tinkerers who think they invented a free energy machine. As Adam Trombly once noted, there are many in the new
energy field who have never done anything productive and often say that nobody
has made them an offer they cannot refuse. Those
producing pedestrian results are not made those offers; the Big Boys are not
stupid. Navigating between the bogus and the genuine is a perilous
endeavor for free energy activists. There is far more chaff than wheat
out there, and some is even fraudulent chaff, although not nearly as much as Mr. Skeptic would have people believe.
Thinking that low
integrity people can be “managed” -
When the BPA Hit Man approached Dennis’ company in
1985, Dennis suspected that he was not who he presented himself as.
Dennis thought he could “manage” him, and actively misdirected him. When
the hit man’s actions cost one of Dennis’ employees
her life, Dennis became radicalized in his pursuit of alternative
energy. I became a pile of frayed nerves a few months after the raid of our facilities in 1988, and a business
associate asked Dennis if he could become his new protégé. Dennis knew
that the man did not have the required integrity for the job but took him on
anyway, while cautioning him that he would probably betray Dennis one
day. Dennis says that only nice guys have betrayed him, as the cutthroats
never get close enough to stick their daggers in his ribs. Instead, his
“friends” always shove the daggers into his back. That opportunity for
betrayal came a few months later, and that protégé gleefully
helped destroy Dennis’ company while he was in jail. A major problem
with people of less-than-high integrity in a free energy effort is that any
success attracts the predators. The predators are not only agents of the
Big Boys, but also the standard predators that populate America’s entrepreneurial
waters.[5] The magnified temptations and
dangers of the free energy environment easily corrupt people of less-than-high
integrity. Managing people of low integrity in a free energy effort is
like holding a faulty bomb with the fuse lit - you cannot throw it far enough
away, and it might still blow up in your hand. The latest instances I encountered of low integrity
people and people’s refusal to recognize the danger they presented helped drive
me back into seclusion.
Overlooking low
integrity because the person has something to offer - This is related to the preceding point. I
have yet to meet an altruistic inventor. Discovering that inventors have
no more integrity than the general population was the second most important
lesson of my journey. Creativity does not confer integrity,
something I learned the hard way. It took me many years of
disillusionment to finally accept the reality. My first professional mentor is the closest thing to
an altruistic inventor that I have met, and my early experience misled me about
the real world of inventors. Whether it is an inventor with an intriguing
energy prototype or somebody who offers funding or a business associate who
offers an alliance, at the first inkling that their integrity is not the
highest, severing the relationship immediately and honorably is the best
remedy, because when times get trying, those people will betray the effort for personal
gain or self-preservation. Many times I have watched people overlook low
integrity because the person had something else that might contribute to the
effort. It has always backfired when the going got tough, and it always
gets tough when pursuing free energy.
Thinking that one can
run below the suppressors’ radar - A
number of free energy inventors and entrepreneurs have tried to invent in secret, distribute in secret, finance
in secret and so on. The Big Boys have an impressive global surveillance infrastructure. I have
yet to see that strategy work. In fact, secrecy plays right into the Big
Boys’ hands, partly because they are masters of clandestine operations (they
prefer operating in dark alleys), and secrecy often leads to paranoia and other
delusions, helping the projects self-destruct before the Big Boys need to lift
a finger. Maybe somebody will run below the radar one day, but so far, it
looks like the high road offers much more promise and aligns with the ideals of
openness and honesty.
Trying to expose
and/or punish the suppressors - The
Big Boys are masters of their game, and trying to beat them at it is a doomed
strategy. Secrecy, deception, violence, arrogance, avarice - these are
their hallmarks. While there have been courageous efforts by whistleblowers and investigators to
expose “bad guys” and/or punish them, the danger
is great, and ultimately, they cannot be beaten at their game.
Exposing, punishing, beating them at their own game - these are all
scarcity-consciousness efforts and are rooted in the victim mentality.
Bringing free energy to the world will take an abundance-oriented effort and
must transcend the victim mentality to become successful. Of course, that
is easier said than done, but changing the prevailing paradigm for the past ten
thousand years is not an easy task. If we want love and forgiveness to
prevail on earth, we need to live it.
Forming a mass
movement around a small and/or weak nucleus - I have burned too much of my life’s energy on building
alternative/free energy efforts, to only watch them quickly disintegrate when
faced with challenges. If a large nucleus of high integrity people cannot
be amassed, then humanity is not ready for free energy and all that can come
with it. It would probably be better to make quilts instead of launch
onto the path of disaster and martyrdom that efforts of insufficient collective
integrity invariably chart.
Forming a movement
around ideologies - Trying to form a
movement around an ideology, whether it is economic, religious, political,
scientific or social is a tacit admission that the movement’s members cannot be
trusted to think for themselves, and herding them along under an ideology’s
banner will not work, not for bringing free energy to the world. All of
today’s earthly ideologies are based on scarcity and most are subtly egocentric,
and will not help an abundance paradigm take root.[6]
Telling your family
and friends about free energy and the toppling of scarcity-based ideologies - Many readers of my work thought they would introduce
their “hip” family members or friends to my work, only to be shocked as they
watched their friends and family members go into irrational
tirades against my work. The vast majority of my “peers” - white, educated
American men - can only read a few pages of my work before blowing a
fuse. Very few people can currently examine the mass assumptions
about reality, as the exercise threatens the “stories” we tell ourselves.
People addicted to their mind crutches do not want to
confront naked reality, and cannot currently pursue free energy. Again, less than one-in-a-thousand are fit for it.
If that is true, then what is the point of this essay?
If all those paths of action listed above
are fraught with peril or even counterproductive, then what? A family
friend was fond of saying, “Let’s do something, even if it is wrong.” The
free energy situation is a conundrum. The scarcity principle is
being artificially enforced on humanity, and the vast majority of humanity will
resist the removal of the chains from their brains. I learned important
lessons along the way, and some relate directly to the free energy conundrum:
As Seth once
said, actions inconsistent with the ideal will always fail to achieve that
ideal. Bringing an abundance paradigm to humanity is as idealistic a
project as was ever conceived. However, humanity is apparently not ready
for it. Not yet. If we were, we would have it, because there are
enough people trying to bring free energy and abundance to the world to make it
happen, if humanity was ready for it. But the Big Boys’ shenanigans and
the masses’ inertia and easy manipulability are formidable obstacles, the
inertia/manipulability being the biggest factors by far.
When the dust settled in Ventura, I realized that if fifty people had
banded around Dennis and his technical experts the way that Mr. Professor and I
did, we had a realistic chance of making free energy a daily reality for
humanity. If it were a hundred, it would have been easy (what I call the hundred heroes strategy). But there may
not be a hundred people to find at that level of commitment. Also, the
price it extracts from those few people can be awesome.
We humans are largely locked into our false
personalities, which is the herd mentality.[7]
Being a herd member can seem comforting, until the herd stampedes off the cliff.
The question I have pondered for many years is this:
Does humanity have to attain enlightenment before it can have free
energy and abundance, or can its daily reality help catalyze it?
Can a group of people begin the movement
toward abundance by simply becoming aware that it is feasible?
Such a strategy asks nothing of anybody but that they think about it,
and perhaps engage in dialogue (and maybe even do some research). If the
hundred heroes model is ever tried, those heroes/heroines will need thousands
of the awake to provide support. In addition, the Scarcity Enforcement
Team will find that strategy more challenging to derail. In some ways,
that might seem as futile as the other strategies, but almost nobody can
currently even think about these issues in an enlightened manner.
Until a sizeable group begins thinking about the issue, the rest seems
futile. Can such a group carry the ball for humanity until they are ready
to carry it themselves? This essay seeks to initiate dialogue on that
issue, and find more of those needles in haystacks.
Other strategies may succeed, and while some
pitfalls are more fatal than others, an effort of direct action by the masses
may limp to the finish line while only stumbling into the lesser pitfalls,
but no effort so far has really had a chance. Are we ready to begin
pursuing abundance?
[1] The two successful attempts were the theft
of the company, engineered by my boss, in
Seattle in 1986, and theft of the company when Dennis was in jail in 1988, engineered by a business associate.
[2]
Why only three thousand? Why not three million? The answer says a
lot about where America is these days.
[3]
For instance, when I was briefly with Dennis in 1996-1997, one of his
volunteers previously volunteered for another prominent free energy inventor.
One day, the volunteer took a nature walk with that inventor and that inventor
confided that he thought he was the Second Coming of Christ. That
admission spooked the volunteer, who came to Dennis’ organization soon
thereafter.
[4]
Recent examples have been various forums where my work has been discussed,
particularly in the energy realm. I present examples of intriguing
technologies in my work, such as here and here, and I have watched engineers and scientists,
who claim expertise in the energy field, dismiss them as of no
consequence, although one was called the world’s most effective engine design
by a major federal study, and the other is the best heating system the world
market has yet seen. Such reactions by scientists and engineers used to
amaze me, but now I accept them as normal. Some of my colleagues have had
access to academics that run world-renowned science institutions and to others
in the scientific establishment’s inner sanctum. My colleagues’ reports
have not been encouraging, as they encounter dogma, arrogance, complacency and
a host of vices avidly cultivated by the scientific establishment’s
authorities.
[5] This quote has been attributed to Howard Scott and others: "A
criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to
form a corporation." Dennis has encountered thousands of them over
the years in America’s entrepreneurial waters.
[6] Even the scientific worldviews are often subtly egocentric, such as
the current Creation Story as portrayed by the Big Bang and Evolution.
Humans are the crowning flower of evolution in that scientific worldview, and
religious ideology, such as the Judeo-Christian religions, present humans as
the apple of God’s eye. Whether coming from scientists or religionists,
the basic message is the same - humans are the best the universe has to offer,
and all inferior beings can be treated accordingly.
[7] The Michael Material deals at length with the false personality and human ensoulment.
Return
to My Home Page (The address on the Internet of my home page is http://www.ahealedplanet.net/home.htm)