911Review.com critiques
This article, from Serendipity.li,
misinterprets evidence from the Pentagon attack
and then advances a bizzarre [sic] theory that the attack plane was
a specially-constructed drone designed to look like a 757.
|
The Attack on The Pentagon by Leonard Spencer
You have arrived, dear reader, via a link from Jim Hoffman's website. Unfortunately Hoffman is less than meticulous in his research, one might almost say careless (perhaps intentionally so), and he supplied an incorrect URL, which is why you have arrived here rather than at the page intended (or perhaps not intended).
Hoffman's "critique" of Spencer's article is hardly evidence of an acute mind at work. Most of his "critique" consists of derogatory comments about Spencer, apparently attempting to prejudice the reader and to deter him or her from an examination of the evidence and argumentation that Spencer puts forward. In that case, however, one wonders why he reproduces Spencer's article at all, since a comparison of the intellectual quality of Spencer's work with that of Hoffman's comments leaves the discerning reader in little doubt as to which deserves greater attention.
To read Leonard Spencer's article, without Hoffman's parenthetical attempts at disinfo, click here.
Those interested in reading more about Hoffman's 9/11 "research" may click here, here and here.
A copy of the entire Serendipity website is available on CD-ROM. Details here.
The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11 Serendipity Home Page